Always Been Close Pure Taboo ((exclusive))

The phrase "always been close, pure taboo" captures a deeply unsettling truth: that the people we are closest to are also the ones we are most strictly forbidden to desire in certain ways. This prohibition does not arise from rational harm calculation alone but from the sacred architecture of culture. The closeness is not an accident that the taboo corrects; rather, the taboo defines and intensifies the closeness by marking it as dangerous.

This paper explores the prevalence and psychological underpinnings of the "always been close" narrative within the genre commonly referred to as "pure taboo" or fauxcest erotica. By examining the intersection of attachment theory, the concept of the "Westermarck Effect," and the psychological mechanism of desensitization, this analysis seeks to understand why narratives featuring pre-existing, intimate platonic relationships evolving into sexual ones are a dominant subset of the taboo genre. The paper argues that the appeal of this trope lies not in the violation of biological kinship, but in the subversion of the "social contract" of safety and the eroticization of trust and proximity. always been close pure taboo

Development of the Shadowserver Dashboard was funded by the UK FCDO. IoT device fingerprinting statistics and honeypot attack statistics co-financed by the Connecting Europe Facility of the European Union (EU CEF VARIoT project).

We would like to thank all our partners that kindly contribute towards data used in the Shadowserver Dashboard, including (alphabetically) APNIC Community Feeds, Bitsight, CISPA, if-is.net, Kryptos Logic, SecurityScorecard, Yokohama National University and all those who chose to remain anonymous.

Shadowserver uses cookies to gather analytics. This allows us to measure how the site is used and improve the experience for our users. For more information about cookies and how Shadowserver uses them, see our privacy policy. We need your consent to use cookies in this way on your device.